100% Free Real Updated AD0-E556 Questions & Answers Pass Your Exam Easily [Q29-Q48]

100% Free Real Updated AD0-E556 Questions & Answers Pass Your Exam Easily

Easily To Pass New AD0-E556 Verified & Correct Answers

NEW QUESTION # 29
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is working for a car manufacturing company in Japan and wants to solve two problems:
1. Receiving errors when trying to integrate Marketo Engage with Salesforce's Custom Object, the custom object of Salesforce is storing the offers and gifts given to each car owner.
2. Store the periodic details of car services of owners in Marketo Engage. This will help the team to edit the records in Marketo Engage. Also, use Filter and Triggers for sending service reminders on Marketo Engage.
This data at present is maintained offline in Excel.
In which two ways can the Architect solve these challenges? (Choose two.)

• A. Problem 2: The Admin can create a segmentation in Marketo Engage
• B. Problem 2: The Admin can use Marketo Engage Custom object
• C. Problem 1: Set the user profile of the Marketo Engage sync user to Admin in Salesforce
• D. Problem 1: Set the language of Marketo Engage sync user to English in Salesforce
• E. Problem 2: The Admin can use Marketo Engage custom activities

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
Explanation
The two ways that the Architect can solve these challenges are to use Marketo Engage Custom object for problem 2 and to set the language of Marketo Engage sync user to English in Salesforce for problem 1. These ways will help the Architect to integrate Marketo Engage with Salesforce's Custom Object and to store the periodic details of car services of owners in Marketo Engage. Using Marketo Engage Custom object for problem 2 will allow the Architect to create a custom object that can store the car service details of owners in Marketo Engage, as well as to use filters and triggers for sending service reminders. Setting the language of Marketo Engage sync user to English in Salesforce for problem 1 will allow the Architect to avoid errors when trying to integrate Marketo Engage with Salesforce's Custom Object, as the language mismatch can cause sync failures or data corruption.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Custom+Objects+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Salesforce+Sync%3A+Overview

NEW QUESTION # 30

Refer to the lifecycle model above.
A company wants improve the efficiency of its sales follow-up and enhance its velocity reporting across the funnel. The company currently uses the out-of-box Adobe Marketo Engage success with detours modeler. The stages are defined as:
1. Anonymous: Leads whose web activity is tracked, but whose identity is not known yet
2. Known: Leads for whom we have an email address or other information that allows us to market to them
3. Engaged: Leads that have engaged us by filling out a form, clicking a link in an email, or visiting our website at least 10 times within a week
4. Lead: Leads with scores greater than 25
5. Sales Person: Leads with scores greater than 30
6. Opportunity: Leads who also have an opportunity attached to them. The Max Age is set to 7 days before it moves to "Lost".
7. Won: Leads who are attached to opportunities that we have closed and Won
8. Recycling: People with scores below 25 that need to be nurtured
9. Disqualified: People who are not a fit for our products and services and we no longer want to market to them
0. Lost: People who are attached to opportunities that we have lost
Once leads reach the "Sales Person" stage, 50% of them do not get followed up by Sales until 7 days later. The Sales leader wants a salesperson to follow up with leads within 4 days.
Which two modifications should the Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant make to the lifecycle model to achieve these goals? (Choose two.)

• A. Modify the "Sales Person" stage from Type: Inventory to Type: SLA and set Max Age to 4 days
• B. Add an additional stage between "Opportunity" and "Won". Set type to SLA and set Max Age to 3 '-' days
• C. Modify the "Opportunity" stage and update the Max Age from 7 days to 4 days
• D. Modify the Sales Person" stage from Type: Gate to Type: SLA and set Max Age to 4 days
• E. Add an additional stage between "Sales Person" and "Opportunity". Set type to SLA and set Max 1 ' Age to 3 days

Answer: D,E

Explanation:
Explanation
The two modifications that the Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant should make to the lifecycle model to achieve these goals are to add an additional stage between "Sales Person" and "Opportunity" and to modify the Sales Person stage from Type: Gate to Type: SLA. These modifications will help the company to improve the efficiency of its sales follow-up and enhance its velocity reporting across the funnel, as well as to ensure that a salesperson follows up with leads within 4 days. Adding an additional stage between "Sales Person" and
"Opportunity" will enable the Consultant to create a separate stage for leads that are being worked by Sales but have not yet become opportunities, as well as to measure the conversion rate and velocity of this stage.
Setting type to SLA and setting Max Age to 3 days for this stage will enable the Consultant to define a service level agreement (SLA) between Marketing and Sales, as well as to monitor and measure the compliance and performance of Sales. Modifying the Sales Person stage from Type: Gate to Type: SLA will enable the Consultant to specify the maximum time that a lead can stay in the Sales Person stage before it is moved to another stage or marked as non-compliant. Setting Max Age to 4 days for this stage will enable the Consultant to align with the Sales leader's goal of following up with leads within 4 days.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler+Best+Practices

NEW QUESTION # 31
The VP of Marketing is concerned about the workload of the marketing team and wants to hire an agency to assist the team by building campaigns and programs within their Adobe Marketo Engage instance. The biggest concern is adding users who may be able to access and accidentally break established templates, nurture campaigns, and scoring. Therefore, the users will only be able to work in the Marketing Activities area.
The agency will have access to building programs, campaigns, emails, and landing pages.
What is the best set of user role permissions for the agency users?

• A. Access Email, Access Landing Page, Web Campaign Editor, Edit Marketing Asset
• B. Edit Marketing Asset, Edit Campaign, Activate Trigger Campaign, Clone Marketing Asset
• C. Edit Marketing Asset, Access Email, Access Landing Page, Export Analytics Data
• D. Web Campaign Editor, Access Email, Activate Trigger Campaign, Clone Marketing Asset

Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 32
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect needs to audit an existing Marketo Engage instance. Upon inspection, more than 1000 fields that only live in Marketo Engage were created for a single use to collect information for a specific event, or ask a specific question during the registration of an event.
What should the Architect recommend to their client regarding field creation best practices?

• A. Create a set of temporary person fields (temp_string 1, temp.string 2, temp.date 1, temp.date 2) and utilize those fields on a local form for every event that requires custom questions. Add them to a static list if data needs to be retained. Clear the data from the temporary fields at the end of the event for utilization by another program.
• B. Create a set of temporary program member fields (PMCF String 1, PMCF String 2, PMCF Boolean 1, PMCF Boolean 2) and utilize those fields on a local form for every event that requires custom questions.
  Add them to a static list if data needs to be retained.
• C. Create a set of temporary program member fields (PMCF String 1, PMCF String 2, PMCF Boolean 1, PMCF Boolean 2) and utilize those fields on a local form for every event that requires custom questions.
  No additional action is needed to retain the data.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
Creating a set of temporary program member fields and using them on local forms for every event that requires custom questions is a good way to avoid creating too many fields that only live in Marketo Engage.
Adding the leads to a static list can help retain the data if needed.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/home.html

NEW QUESTION # 33
An Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant is reviewing all programs in an instance. Each campaign in each program contains at least three flow steps:
* If Acquisition Program is Empty, change Acquisition Program to the current program's name
* Change the status in the program (based on the action)
* Write an Interesting Moment
These flow steps happen in almost every campaign.
How can the Consultant edit the programs for scalability and efficiency?

• A. Create global Interesting Moments campaigns based on specific triggers and using tokens
• B. Create a global program and coordinating campaigns to update the acquisition program to the latest program touched
• C. Remove the program status change because this will be handled by the Acquisition Program update

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
The Consultant can edit the programs for scalability and efficiency by creating a global program and coordinating campaigns to update the acquisition program to the latest program touched. This will allow the Consultant to streamline and optimize the process of updating the acquisition program for each lead, instead of having multiple flow steps in each campaign. The global program can use triggers and filters to capture leads from different sources and channels, and use tokens to dynamically update the acquisition program based on the latest program touched. This will also reduce the number of campaigns in the queue and improve the campaign performance.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Acquisition+Program
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Global+Programs

NEW QUESTION # 34
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
A key revenue source for Unicorn is "skips". This source is made up of customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn wants to attribute this revenue from these customers to their campaigns. Unicorn IT has done the due diligence to be able to receive access to this data.
For Marketo's revenue attribution model and overall data architecture, in which location should this data be available to Marketo?

• A. Stored on the Salesforce Opportunity Object and synced to Marketo via the native sync
• B. Stored directly on the Person record
• C. Stored in a Marketo Custom Object
• D. Stored on a Salesforce Custom Object and synced to Marketo via the native sync

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
Storing the data on the Salesforce Opportunity Object and syncing to Marketo via the native sync is the best location for Marketo's revenue attribution model and overall data architecture. This way, Marketo can use the Opportunity Influence Analyzer and the Revenue Cycle Modeler to attribute revenue to campaigns based on the opportunity data. Storing the data directly on the Person record would not allow for revenue attribution, as Marketo does not use person-level fields for this purpose. Storing the data on a Salesforce Custom Object or a Marketo Custom Object would require additional configuration and integration to link the data to the person and the opportunity.

NEW QUESTION # 35
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
With help from the Adobe Marketo Engage Architects, Unicorn has an audit of their system and finds the following issues:
* Mass uploading spreadsheet data with mistakes and failure to check with Salesforce data caused a large number of Person records with the wrong Country field value in place. This reduces how many MQL leads are being sent in a timely fashion to the right team in their CRM.
* Many fields in Marketo Engage must be hidden and field blocked. The fields are not currently being used in day-to-day Programs, Lists, or Assets.
* The current Webinar and Tradeshow Event Program templates are not optimized. They have too many steps for the actions captured, and do not use 'My Tokens' as effectively as they could.
Only one person is making these changes. There is no need for 'quick wins' In which order of importance should these issues be fixed?

• A. Make Old Fields Hidden, Program Templates, Country Data
• B. Country Data, Program Templates, Make Old Fields Hidden
• C. Country Data, Make Old Fields Hidden, Program Templates

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The order of importance for fixing these issues should be based on the impact they have on the lead generation and management process. The Country Data issue is the most urgent, because it affects the lead routing and qualification process, and may result in lost or delayed opportunities. The Make Old Fields Hidden issue is the next important, because it affects the data quality and security, and may cause confusion or errors in the future.
The Program Templates issue is the least important, because it affects the efficiency and consistency of thecampaign execution, but not the core functionality or performance. References:
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Data+Managementhttps://docs.marketo.com

NEW QUESTION # 36
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect notices that the smart campaigns run slowly. The Campaign Queue in Marketing Activities is full of backlog campaigns. The alerts fire with a delay. All alert smart campaignsare triggered based on the first step of Change Data Value. All Batch campaigns use the Advanced Wait Properties at the first step to run the campaign every Monday at 8:00 PM PT.
Which steps should the Architect perform to scale the campaign execution?

• A. For campaigns sending alerts, add Sync to SFDC step to first. For batch campaigns, use normal Wait instead of Advanced Wait Properties.
• B. For campaigns sending alerts, move the Send Alert step to first. For batch campaigns, use batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties.
• C. For campaigns sending alerts, move the Send Alert step to first. For batch campaigns, make sure that the wait time is less than 10 minutes.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
The steps that the Architect should perform to scale the campaign execution are to move the Send Alert step to first for campaigns sending alerts, and to use batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties for batch campaigns. These steps will help the Architect to improve the speed and efficiency of the smart campaigns, as well as reduce the backlog in the campaign queue. Moving the Send Alert step to first will ensure that alerts are sent immediately without waiting for other flow steps or triggers, which can cause delays or errors. Using batch campaign scheduler instead of Advanced Wait Properties will allow the Architect to schedule batch campaigns at a specific date and time, instead of using a wait step that can clog up the queue or run at suboptimal times.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Smart+Campaigns+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Schedule+a+Batch+Campaign
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Wait+Flow+Action

NEW QUESTION # 37
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is working for Too Big to Fail Co., an enterprise company that has an
8-year-old Marketo Engage instance (A). Too Big to Fail Co. recently purchased start up Treat Snack LTD, which has 100 employees and its own Marketo Engage instance (B). The Architect needs to merge the two instances and maintain business continuity. No additional budget, funding, or resources are available for the merger and migration.
The Architect needs to determine the most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution to meet the business needs. The two instances need to be merged in 3 months.
Which actions should the Architect take?

• A. * Dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A)
  * Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
  * Audit the instance for critical business functions
  * Rebuild in instance (A)
• B. * Spin up a new instance (C)
  * Dedupe leads across both instances (A and B) and import into the new instance (C)
  * Audit highest-performing assets and key critical campaigns in both instances
  * Rebuild in the new instance (C)
• C. * Dedupe instance (A) database and import the leads into instance (B)
  * Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
  * Audit the instance for critical business functions
  * Rebuild in instance (B)

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution are to dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A), determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets, audit the instance for critical business functions, and rebuild in instance (A). This is because instance (A) is older and likely has more data, assets, and integrations than instance (B), and it would be easier and faster to migrate the smaller instance into the larger one. Deduping the leads and determining the highest-performing assets are essential steps to avoid data quality issues and maintain campaign performance.
Auditing the instance for critical business functions and rebuilding them in instance (A) are necessary steps to ensure business continuity and alignment. The other options are not as feasible or efficient as this one, because they involve creating a new instance or migrating the larger instance into the smaller one, which would require more time, resources, and complexity.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Instance+Migration+Guide
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Data+Management

NEW QUESTION # 38
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect has just hired a new person to join their team. They have been tasked with building a new lifecycle model and you work together to develop a solution. The top half of the funnel stages (Known, Engaged, MQL) will be driven by Marketo Engage where as the bottom half of the funnel will be driven by specific data value changes in salesforce. Due to this quarter's budget reasons, there were not enough funds to subscribe to Revenue Explorer or Bizible but it will be prioritized for the next fiscal year.
Which scalable approach should the Architect choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately?

• A. Build trigger logic in a program. Build the triggers in the Revenue Cycle Model to listen for stage changes driven by the program.
• B. Build a program to listen to the movement driven by the Revenue Cycle Model.
• C. Build trigger logic in a program.Create a field for revenue stage and a date field for each stage to track date of entry into that field.
• D. Build trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The scalable approach that the Architect should choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately is to build trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model. This approach will allow the Architect to create a lifecycle model that is driven by Marketo Engage for the top half of the funnel stages and by specific data value changes in Salesforce for the bottom half of the funnel stages, without requiring an active revenue cycle model. Building trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model will enable the Architect to define the criteria and conditions for each stage transition, as well as to track and measure the lead movement across the funnel stages.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Revenue+Cycle+Modeler+Best+Practices

NEW QUESTION # 39
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
The Unicorn Marketing Operations team has five custom integrations pushing and pulling data between Adobe Marketo Engage and other third-party systems. All five custom integrations are currently using the same API user and custom Launchpoint service.
What should be the primary security concern for Unicorn?

• A. Using a single API user only does not allow Webhooks to be sent to the right location
• B. The Unicorn Marketo Engage Admin cannot see which integration is consuming API calls, so risk O exceeding API call limits
• C. This scenario does not allow for IP restrictions to be enforced for incoming traffic to the Marketo ° REST API
• D. All five custom integrations are using the same shared API credentials including client ID and O client secret

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
All five custom integrations are using the same shared API credentials including client ID and client secret is the primary security concern for Unicorn. This means that if one of the integrations is compromised or misconfigured, it could affect the security and functionality of the other integrations. It also means that if Unicorn needs to revoke or change the API credentials for any reason, it would impact all five integrations at once. It would be better to use separate API credentials for each integration, and follow the best practices for securing and managing them. The Unicorn Marketo Engage Admin cannot see which integration is consuming API calls, so risk exceeding API call limits is not a primary security concern, but rather a performance concern. This scenario does not allow for IP restrictions to be enforced for incoming traffic to the Marketo REST API is not a primary security concern, as IP restrictions are optional and not required for the REST API.
Using a single API user only does not allow Webhooks to be sent to the right location is not a primary security concern, as Webhooks are not dependent on the API user or the Launchpoint service.

NEW QUESTION # 40
A company wants to generate new leads through content syndication. The goal is not to pay for existing leads.
A third-party company will send leads through an API directly to the Adobe Marketo Engage instance.
The third-party company passes the following information through the API:
* First
* Last
* Email
* Person Source
* Company
* Asset Name
An Architect needs to create a program that captures leads and evaluates if the leads are new or existing.
Engagement will also be captured on all leads. Only new leads must be scored and sent a welcome email.
Existing leads will then be excluded from the program and sent back through the API to the third-party company.
Which order of steps is required to build this program?

• A. Remove from Flow > Change Data Value > Add to Program > Change Score > Call Webhook
• B. Remove from Flow > Call Webhook > Change Data Value > Change Program Status > Change Score
• C. Change Data Value > Change Program Status > Call Webhook > Remove from Flow > Send Email
• D. Change Program Status > Call Webhook > Change Data Value > Send Email > Remove from Flow

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The order of steps required to build this program is to change data value, change program status, call webhook, remove from flow, and send email. This is because these steps will allow the program to capture leads and evaluate if they are new or existing, aswell as capture engagement and perform the desired actions. The change data value step will update the person source and asset name fields based on the API information. The change program status step will update the program status based on whether the lead is new or existing. The call webhook step will send existing leads back to the third-party company through the API. The remove from flow step will exclude existing leads from the program. The send email step will send a welcome email to new leads only. The other options are not as correct as this one, because they either miss some of the required steps or include some of the unnecessary steps.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Programs+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Smart+Campaigns+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Webhooks

NEW QUESTION # 41
An Architect notices that deliverability is slowly decreasing over time. After pulling a year of reports, the Administrator notices that the number of emails per month has increased from 3 to 10. The unsubscribe rates nearly double each quarter. Per the CMO, the amount of marketing activity must remain the same.
Which two actions can the Architectr take to make sure emails reach people in their database? (Choose two.)

• A. Make marketing emails operational so people who have unsubscribed continue to receive ^ communications
• B. Work with the marketing team to decrease the number of email sends per month
• C. Decrease behavior scores when someone unsubscribes from an email
• D. Implement communication limits so people receive fewer emails
• E. Create a "marketable" smart list to include on every send that excludes multiple soft bounces

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
Explanation
Implementing communication limits and decreasing the number of email sends per month are two actions that can help improve deliverability by reducing email fatigue and spam complaints. Making marketing emails operational or decreasing behavior scores are not recommended as they can harm the sender reputation and engagement. Creating a "marketable" smart list is not relevant to the deliverability issue.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo-events/events/marketo-and-mochas/2023/deliverability-part-o

NEW QUESTION # 42
A company has a meeting with a third party that wants to begin submitting leads captured through various channels. These leads are aware that the third party will share their information with the company and have provided consent through their engagement. The third party will send the leads through a REST API.
Which steps should the Adobe Marketo Engage Architect take to make sure that the REST API is set up correctly?

• A. Create API User Role, Use an existing API User, Create new Launchpoint Service, Run a Call test with Identity and Endpoint
• B. Create API User Role, Create a new API User, Create new Launchpoint Service, Run a Call test with Token and Endpoint
• C. Create API User Role, Create a new API User, Create new Launchpoint Service, Run a Call test with Identity and Endpoint
• D. Create API User Role, Use an existing API User, Create new Launchpoint Service, Run a Call test with Token and Identity

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The steps that the Adobe Marketo Engage Architect should take to make sure that the REST API is set up correctly are to create API User Role, create a new API User, create new Launchpoint Service, and run a Call test with Identity and Endpoint. These steps will allow the Architect to configure and test the REST API integration with Marketo Engage. Creating API User Role will enable the Architect to define the permissions and access level for the API User. Creating a new API User will enable the Architect to generate a unique Client ID and Client Secret for authentication. Creating new Launchpoint Service will enable the Architect to register and manage the third-party service in Marketo Engage. Running a Call test with Identity and Endpoint will enable the Architect to verify that the API calls are working properly and that leads can be submitted through various channels.
References: https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Create+an+API+Only+User+Role
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Create+a+Custom+Service
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Webhooks

NEW QUESTION # 43
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a newloan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
Unicorn reaches its Salesforce API limit daily, which causes a backlog of issues in each system. The workflow of the employees who have to use them is also heavily affected by this issue. It takes hours to days for the correct data to come into Adobe Marketo Engage and Salesforce but it's important for newleads to be synced after creation as soon as possible. The IT team has reviewed which applications are using the API and suspect Marketo Engage is the culprit.
Before raising their API limit, which two tasks should an Architect perform to resolve

• A. Change from using 'Add to Salesforce Campaign' smart campaign workflow step, and instead use the native 'Marketo Program/Campaign' sync setup
• B. Change any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps to Request Campaign that runs daily to reduce load
• C. Remove any additional 'Sync to SFDC Workflow steps in Smart Campaigns other than the dedicated ones managing the sync
• D. Change any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps into batch campaigns that run daily to reduce load
• E. Change any third-party form integrations into Marketo Engage or Salesforce forms to cut down on additional API usage

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
Explanation
Changing any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps to Request Campaign that runs daily to reduce load and changing any additional Smart Campaigns with the 'Sync to SFDC workflow steps into batch campaigns that run daily to reduce load are two tasks that an Architect should perform to resolve the issue of reaching the Salesforce API limit daily. These tasks would help reduce the number of API calls made by Marketo Engage to Salesforce and avoid exceeding the rate limit or concurrency limit. Changing any third-party form integrations into Marketo Engage or Salesforce forms to cut down on additional API usage would not help with the issue of syncing new leads as soon as possible. Changing from using 'Add to Salesforce Campaign' smart campaign workflow step, and instead use the native 'Marketo Program/Campaign' sync setup would not reduce the number of API calls made by Marketo Engage to Salesforce. Removing any additional 'Sync to SFDC Workflow steps in Smart Campaigns other than the dedicated ones managing the sync would not ensure that new leads are synced after creation as soon as possible.
https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/
https://developers.marketo.com/rest-api/marketo-integration-best-practices/

NEW QUESTION # 44
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect is working for Too Big to Fail Co., an enterprise company that has an
8-year-old Marketo Engage instance (A). Too Big to Fail Co. recently purchased start up Treat Snack LTD, which has 100 employees and its own Marketo Engage instance (B). The Architect needs to merge the two instances and maintain business continuity. No additional budget, funding, or resources are available for the merger and migration.
The Architect needs to determine the most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution to meet the business needs. The two instances need to be merged in 3 months.
Which actions should the Architect take?

• A. * Dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A)
  * Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
  * Audit the instance for critical business functions
  * Rebuild in instance (A)
• B. * Spin up a new instance (C)
  * Dedupe leads across both instances (A and B) and import into the new instance (C)
  * Audit highest-performing assets and key critical campaigns in both instances
  * Rebuild in the new instance (C)
• C. * Dedupe instance (A) database and import the leads into instance (B)
  * Determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets
  * Audit the instance for critical business functions
  * Rebuild in instance (B)

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The most important actions to take for the minimum viable solution are to dedupe the instance (B) database and import the leads into instance (A), determine the highest-performing assets and rebuild the campaigns relevant to those assets, audit the instance for critical business functions, and rebuild in instance (A). This is because instance (A) is older and likely has more data, assets, and integrations than instance (B), and it would be easier and faster to migrate the smaller instance into the larger one. Deduping the leads and determining the highest-performing assets are essential steps to avoid data quality issues and maintain campaign performance.
Auditing the instance for critical business functions and rebuilding them in instance (A) are necessary steps to ensure business continuity and alignment. The other options are not as feasible or efficient as this one, because they involve creating a new instance or migrating the larger instance into the smaller one, which would require more time, resources, and complexity.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Instance+Migration+Guide
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Data+Management

NEW QUESTION # 45
A large global company hires a media agency to run their paid social campaigns. They use a standardized UTM structure to track paid activities, which will allow them to differentiate paid efforts versus organic efforts. For example, UTM-source=paid social, UTM-medium=facebook, UTM-campaign:=B2B-social, UTM-content=Definitive-guide-to-paid-social. Cost will be added to the Adobe Marketo Engage programs on a monthly basis. The same assets will be used across campaigns and social platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Linkedln).
Which Marketo Engage program structure will allow the company to determine paid social effectiveness and ROI?

• A. * A program in the Global Content channel will capture member success
  * A program in the paid social channel will capture member success and one will be created for each asset and social media campaign
  * Cost will be added to each paid social program and content program
• B. * A program in the Global Content channel will capture member success, and a program will be created for each asset regardless of the platform that drove the person to the asset
  * UTMs will be used to place people in static lists to separate out the different platforms that drove the lead
  * Cost will be added to each Global Content program
• C. * A program in the Global Content channel will capture membership but not success
  * A program in the paid social channel will capture member success
  * Each program in the social media channel will be created for each paid social campaign
  * Cost will be added to paid social programs

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The requirement should be met by creating one set of channels and using a tag to determine Direct or Partner.
This will allow the company to report on the efficacy of direct marketing and investment to third-party seller/partner marketing, as well as to determine how budget should be spent the following year. Creating one set of channels will enable the company to use consistent and standardized metrics and definitions for each channel type, such as webinar, paid social, virtual event, etc. Using a tag to determine Direct or Partner will enable the company to differentiate and track the performance and ROI of each marketing channel based on whether it was executed by the company or by a third-party seller.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Programs+and+Channels
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Tags

NEW QUESTION # 46
Refer to the lifecycle model above.

A company wants to increase the number of leads sent to Sales. The Sales and Marketing teams need to meet quarterly conversion rate goals. These teams use the out-of-box Adobe Marketo Engage success (only) modeler. The stages are defined as:
1. Anonymous: Leads for which web activity is tracked, but whose identity is not known yet
2. Known: Leads for which we have an email address or other information that allows us to market to them
3. Engaged: Leads that have engaged us by filling out a form, clicking a link in an email, or visiting our website at least 10 times within a week
4. Lead: Leads with scores greater than 25
5. Sales Lead: Leads with scores greater than 30
6. Opportunity: Leads that also have an opportunity attached to them
7. Won: Leads that are attached to opportunities that we have closed and Won In a meeting to discuss how to increase the amount of sales leads, someone suggests scoring leads who have clicked a link in an email with +35 points.
As the Adobe Marketo Engage Consultant, what are the effects of the lifecycle if this suggestion is implemented? (Choose two.)

• A. Conversion from Opportunity -> Won would increase
• B. Conversion from Lead -> Sales Lead would increase
• C. Conversion from Known -> Engaged would decrease
• D. Conversion from Sales Lead -> Opportunity would decrease
• E. Conversion from Sales Lead -> Opportunity would increase

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
Explanation
The effects of the lifecycle if this suggestion is implemented are that the conversion from Lead -> Sales Lead would increase and the conversion from Sales Lead -> Opportunity would decrease. This is because scoring leads who have clicked a link in an email with +35 points would make them jump from Known to Sales Lead in one step, bypassing the Engaged and Lead stages. This would increase the number of leads sent to Sales, but it would also decrease the quality and readiness of those leads, as they may not be truly interested or qualified for the product or service. This would result in lower conversion rates from Sales Lead to Opportunity, as well as lower sales efficiency and effectiveness.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Success+Path+Analyzer
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Lead+Scoring

NEW QUESTION # 47
A Sales team reports to Marketing that they receive false MQLs regularly. The Adobe Marketo Engage instance has three fields to track lead scores:
* "Total Score" is a sum of Behavior and Demographic Scores.
* A prospect gets graduated to MQL as soon as "Behavior Score" changes to 100 or greater and 'Demographic Score" must be at least 20.
* All "Demographic Score" smart campaigns are set up using "Person is Created" trigger with no filters.
The Marketo Engage Administrator audits the false MQLs and learns that most of them received a
"Demographic Score" of +20 for being in a target "Job Title" and preferred "Country". Their "Demographic Scoring" was not completed. They received -10 for the "Industry" because these false MQLs are from Universities.
Which two sets of actions should the Architect take to stop sending the false MQLs to the Sales team? (Choose two.)

• A. Use trigger "Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
  In the Flow steps, use "Wait", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating
  "Demographic MQL Score" field
• B. Use trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
  In the Flow steps, use "Change Score", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating "Demographic MQL Score" field
• C. Create a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" Update the MQL Smart Campaign to use "Demographic MQL Score = True" as a filter and as a trigger
• D. Create a Score field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" Update the MQL Smart Campaign to use "Demographic MQL Score = True" as a filter and as a trigger
• E. Use trigger "Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field"
  In the Flow steps, use "Change Score", "Remove from Flow", and "Change Data Value" for updating "Demographic MQL Score" field

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
Explanation
The two sets of actions that the Architect should take to stop sending the false MQLs to the Sales team are to use trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field" and to create a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score". These actions will help the Architect to improve the lead scoring and qualification process, as well as to avoid sending leads that are not ready or qualified to the Sales team. Using trigger "Not Score is Changed" on "Demographic Field" will ensure that leads are scored only once based on their demographic attributes, instead of multiple times based on their behaviors. Creating a Boolean field and Smart-Campaign called "Demographic MQL Score" will enable the Architect to mark leads as Demographic MQLs based on their score and criteria, and to use this field as a filter and trigger for updating the MQL status.
References: https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Scoring+Overview
https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Best+Practices%3A+Lead+Scoring

NEW QUESTION # 48
......

Free AD0-E556 Exam Files Downloaded Instantly: https://easytest.exams4collection.com/AD0-E556-latest-braindumps.html